I bet you laughed at the mere suggestion of this but hear me out.
It's true that this year's thoughts on the future of our coach are up for debate as it stands considering our awful start to the season. Either way, I just wanted to dispel peoples theories that Ed should have went long ago and that up until September 2007 he wasn't a great coach for us. So, I've looked at his coaching record vs. Dave Whistles - our greatest coach ever.
I skipped the 00-01 season under Whistle as it was a building year, instead looking at his best two seasons in which we won the league one year and finished second in another. Equally I took in Ed's first two years in which we again won the league one year and finished second in the next.
From 2001 to 2002 we played 123 games compared to 112 between 2005 and 2007. We won 73 games under Whistle, 69 under Ed. We scored 164 points when you factor in all competitions under Whistle and 159 under Courtenay. That equates to 1.33 points per game under Whistle and 1.42 points per game under Ed. Our win percentage under Whistle was .667 compared to .670 under Courtenay. Ed's brand of hockey was also as entertaining as it got averaging 3.65 goals a game in comparison to 3.55 under Whistle.
Not really that bad is it? In fact it's better.
Oh and anyone suggesting we're not as physical as we once were, we took 2224 penalty minutes in Whistles two years compared to 2754 under Courtenay. (Granted those stats are a little misleading what with the introduction of zero tolerance last year).
Now don't get me wrong, I'm not saying Ed was better than the great Whistle, after all the Elite League is a different kind of hockey to the Super league, though it could be argued that coaching in the EIHL is as tough or tougher than the ISL what with player development.
What I do think however, is any criticism (pre-September 07 at least) is maybe a little harsh and a little quick as we have arguably had our most winning, most scoring two years under Ed. The current pressure is probably fair but maybe Ed does deserve the chance to make his changes and put things to right before we consider burning him at the stake.
| SEASON | PL | W | L | OT | T | PTS | GF | GA | PIMS | GPG | PPG | PCT |
| 01-03 | 123 | 73 | 32 | 1 | 17 | 164 | 437 | 303 | 2224 | 3.55 | 1.33 | .667 |
| 05-07 | 112 | 69 | 31 | 5 | 7 | 159 | 409 | 296 | 2754 | 3.65 | 1.42 | .670 |
PL - Games played, W - Wins, L - Losses, OT - Overtime Losses, T - Ties, PTS - Points, GF - Goals For, GA - Goals Against, PIMS - Penalty Minutes, GPG - Goals per game, PPG - Points per Game, PCT - Win Percentage (Wins added to half of the combined total of OT losses and Ties, divided by Games played).
Stats gathered from giants-history.com
| P | TEAM | GP | W(OT) | L(OT) | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Giants | 54 | 46(0) | 5(3) | 95 |
| 2 | Steelers | 54 | 41(0) | 11(2) | 84 |
| 3 | Panthers | 54 | 38(0) | 12(4) | 80 |
| 4 | Devils | 54 | 32(0) | 12(10) | 74 |
| 5 | Blaze | 54 | 32(0) | 20(2) | 66 |
| 6 | Clan | 54 | 31(0) | 19(4) | 66 |
| 7 | Stingrays | 54 | 16(0) | 34(4) | 36 |
| 8 | Stars | 54 | 13(0) | 35(6) | 32 |
| 9 | Capitals | 54 | 13(0) | 37(4) | 30 |
| 10 | Flyers | 54 | 8(0) | 40(6) | 22 |
| Points | Robert Dowd | 78 |
|---|---|---|
| Goals | Robert Dowd | 40 |
| Assists | Craig Peacock | 49 |
| PIM | Adam Keefe | 247 |